Trademark search for:

AGROX

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1950-03-24 — Application filed
1972-05-13 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 20 yrs)
1992-06-23 — Registered - sec. 9 filed/check record for sec. 8
1992-08-17 — Registered and renewed (second renewal - 10 yrs)
2002-05-07 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2002-05-07 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2002-07-15 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2002-07-15 — Registered and renewed (third renewal - 10 yrs)
2004-12-08 — Teas change of correspondence received
2006-02-24 — Teas change of owner address received
2008-04-02 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2008-04-16 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2008-10-10 — Case file in ticrs
2008-11-05 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2008-11-05 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2013-06-12 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2016-04-01 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2016-04-01 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

ARYSTA LIFESCIENCE NORTH AMERICA, LLC
CARY , NC

ARYSTA LIFESCIENCE NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION
Cary , NC

ARVESTA CORPORATION
SAN FRANCISCO , CA

ICI CANADA INC.
NORTH YORK, ONTARIO CA

PLANT PROTECTION LIMITED
YALDING GB

Correspondent

Michelle L. Mehok Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
12255 El Camino Real, Suite 300
San Diego, CA 92130-4088
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1950-03-24

Status Date:
2016-04-01

Category:
Pharmaceuticals

Filing Year:
1950

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.