Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
1985 ›
AC ›
ACETONA
Trademark search for:
ACETONA
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1985-05-15 — Application filed
1985-07-23 — Assigned to examiner
1985-07-25 — Final disposition recorded
1985-09-10 — Correspondence received in law office
1985-09-27 — Examiners amendment mailed
1986-03-03 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
1986-08-21 — Correspondence received in law office
1986-09-02 — Letter of suspension mailed
1987-09-02 — Assigned to examiner
1987-09-09 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
1988-02-19 — Correspondence received in law office
1988-04-14 — Letter of suspension mailed
1988-10-11 — Correspondence received in law office
1988-10-20 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
1988-12-15 — Final disposition recorded
1989-05-31 — Correspondence received in law office
1989-06-26 — Correspondence received in law office
1989-08-07 — Office action issued
1990-02-07 — Examiner's amendment mailed
1990-02-14 — Approved for pub - principal register
1990-06-09 — Notice of publication
1990-07-10 — Published for opposition
1990-10-02 — Registered-principal register
1997-04-07 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
1997-04-07 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
SUOMEN REHU OY
HELSINKI FI
SUOMEN REHU OY
HELSINKI FI
SUOMEN REHU OY
HELSINKI FI
FARMOS-YHTYMA OY (FARMOS GROUP LTD.)
TURKU FI
Correspondent
JANIS M MANNING BURNS, DOANE, SWECKER & MATHIS WASHINGTON & PRINCE ST P O BOX 1404 THE GEORGE MASON BLDG ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1985-05-15
Status Date:
1997-04-07
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.