Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
1989 ›
CE ›
CEZAM
Trademark search for:
CEZAM
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1989-10-13 — Application filed
1989-11-21 — Correspondence received in law office
1989-12-22 — Final disposition recorded
1990-06-22 — Correspondence received in law office
1990-08-22 — Correspondence received in law office
1990-08-27 — Letter of suspension mailed
1990-09-07 — Letter of suspension mailed
1990-12-10 — Correspondence received in law office
1991-02-08 — Letter of suspension mailed
1991-08-12 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
1991-09-25 — Correspondence received in law office
1991-10-28 — Letter of suspension mailed
1992-04-28 — Correspondence received in law office
1992-05-08 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
1992-06-18 — Letter of suspension mailed
1992-12-29 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
1993-03-31 — Correspondence received in law office
1993-06-09 — Final disposition recorded
1993-06-29 — Correspondence received in law office
1993-07-19 — Approved for pub - principal register
1993-10-22 — Notice of publication
1993-11-23 — Published for opposition
1994-02-15 — Registered-principal register
2001-02-24 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2001-02-24 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
SOCIETE D'ETUDE DES CATALYSEURS
92160 ANTONY FR
SOCIETE D'ETUDE DES CATALYSEURS
92160 ANTONY FR
SOCIETE D'ETUDE DES CATALYSEURS
92160 ANTONY FR
Correspondent
GORDON D COPLEIN DARBY & DARBY PC 805 THIRD AVE NEW YORK, NY 10022 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1989-10-13
Status Date:
2001-02-24
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.