Brandinium

Trademark search for:

EPI-MEK

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2001-11-05 — Application filed
  • 2002-02-05 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2002-02-08 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2002-03-20 — Notice of publication
  • 2002-04-09 — Published for opposition
  • 2002-07-02 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2003-01-02 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2003-05-18 — Application abandoned
  • 2003-06-05 — Paper received
  • 2003-06-05 — Petition to revive-received
  • 2003-06-10 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2003-07-02 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2003-09-30 — Incomplete petition notice mailed
  • 2003-10-10 — Paper received
  • 2003-10-10 — Communication received from petitioner
  • 2003-11-12 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2003-11-12 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2004-01-02 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2004-03-10 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2004-03-31 — Application abandoned
  • 2004-04-28 — Paper received
  • 2004-04-28 — Petition to revive-received
  • 2004-06-25 — Use amendment filed
  • 2004-06-25 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2004-08-26 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2004-09-01 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2004-09-03 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2004-09-04 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2004-09-16 — Assigned to lie
  • 2004-09-16 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2004-11-09 — Registered-principal register
  • 2009-11-10 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2009-11-20 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2009-11-21 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2014-03-31 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2014-03-31 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2014-07-08 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2014-07-23 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2014-07-23 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8 & 9
  • 2014-08-12 — Office action issued
  • 2015-02-10 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2015-02-10 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2015-02-10 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 9 - e-mailed
  • 2015-02-13 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2015-02-13 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2018-04-04 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2021-02-24 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2021-02-24 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2021-02-24 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2021-02-24 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2021-02-24 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
  • 2021-02-24 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2023-11-09 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2024-02-14 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2024-02-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2024-02-14 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2025-05-23 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2025-05-23 — Final status recorded
  • 2025-08-21 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2025-08-21 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2025-08-21 — Teas change of correspondence received

Owner Information

SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC
Greensboro , NC
Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.
Greensboro , NC
Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.
Greensboro , NC
Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.
Greensboro , NC

Correspondent

Paul Cosmovici
244 Fifth Avenue, 2nd Floor # suite-1279
New York, NY 10001
United States

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2001-11-05
Status Date:
2025-05-23
Category:
Pharmaceuticals
Filing Year:
1990

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.