Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
1991 ›
AN ›
ANIPEL
Trademark search for:
ANIPEL
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1991-10-24 — Application filed
1991-12-16 — Assigned to examiner
1992-01-08 — Final disposition recorded
1992-06-01 — Correspondence received in law office
1992-08-06 — Final disposition recorded
1992-10-19 — Correspondence received in law office
1992-11-09 — Final disposition recorded
1992-12-10 — Correspondence received in law office
1992-12-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
1993-01-07 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
1993-01-14 — Letter of suspension mailed
1993-07-13 — Correspondence received in law office
1993-07-27 — Letter of suspension mailed
1994-01-07 — Correspondence received in law office
1994-03-11 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
1994-09-09 — Correspondence received in law office
1994-10-13 — Letter of suspension mailed
1994-12-20 — Correspondence received in law office
1995-02-02 — Approved for pub - principal register
1995-02-28 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
1995-03-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
1995-04-04 — Sec. 1(b) claim deleted
1995-07-07 — Notice of publication
1995-08-08 — Published for opposition
1995-10-31 — Registered-principal register
2002-08-03 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2002-08-03 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Meconic Limited
Edinburgh EH11 2AQ GB
Meconic Limited
Edinburgh EH11 2AQ GB
Meconic Limited
Edinburgh EH11 2AQ GB
Correspondent
DAVID C GRYCE 1225 EYE ST NW STE 1000 WASHINGTON, DC 20005 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1991-10-24
Status Date:
2002-08-03
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.