Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
1992 ›
OM ›
OMEGAVENOUS
Trademark search for:
OMEGAVENOUS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1992-09-25 — Application filed
1992-12-31 — Approved for pub - principal register
1993-01-23 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
1993-02-02 — Final disposition recorded
1993-03-12 — Examiner's amendment mailed
1993-03-16 — Approved for pub - principal register
1993-04-18 — Notice of publication
1993-05-18 — Published for opposition
1993-08-10 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
1993-12-12 — Sou extension 1 filed
1994-02-07 — Sou extension 1 granted
1994-06-29 — Sou extension 2 filed
1994-08-16 — Sou extension 2 granted
1994-11-10 — Sou extension 3 filed
1994-12-14 — Sou extension 3 granted
1995-04-24 — Sou extension 4 filed
1995-06-07 — Sou extension 4 granted
1996-02-10 — Sou extension 5 filed
1996-02-12 — Use amendment filed
1996-05-06 — Sou extension 5 granted
1996-12-06 — Application abandoned
1997-02-04 — Reinstated
1997-02-19 — Statement of use processing complete
1997-03-06 — Examiners amendment -written
1997-03-12 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
1997-04-29 — Registered-principal register
2004-01-31 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2004-01-31 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Fresenius Aktiengesellschaft
6370 Oberursel 1 DE
Fresenius Aktiengesellschaft
6370 Oberursel 1 DE
Fresenius Aktiengesellschaft
6370 Oberursel 1 DE
Correspondent
JAY K MEADWAY PANITCH SCHWARZE JACOBS & NADEL 1601 MARKET ST 36TH FL PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2398 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1992-09-25
Status Date:
2004-01-31
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.