Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
1992 ›
RU ›
RUMEN-BAC PLUS
Trademark search for:
RUMEN-BAC PLUS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1992-06-08 — Application filed
1992-08-18 — Assigned to examiner
1992-08-20 — Approved for pub - principal register
1992-11-06 — Notice of publication
1992-12-08 — Published for opposition
1993-03-02 — Registered-principal register
1998-03-20 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
1998-07-24 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2003-02-19 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2003-02-19 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2003-04-18 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2003-04-18 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2003-11-07 — Teas change of correspondence received
2008-06-27 — Case file in ticrs
2013-02-28 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2013-03-17 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2013-03-17 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2013-03-17 — Registered and renewed (second renewal - 10 yrs)
2013-03-17 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 9 - e-mailed
2022-03-02 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2023-09-15 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2023-09-15 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
TransAgra International Inc.
Chicago , IL
TransAgra International Inc.
Chicago , IL
TransAgra International Inc.
Chicago , IL
Correspondent
GEORGE H. KOBAYASHI MASUDA, FUNAI, EIFERT & MITCHELL, LTD. 203 NORTH LASALLE STREET SUITE 2500 CHICAGO, IL 60601-1262
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1992-06-08
Status Date:
2023-09-15
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.