Brandinium

Trademark search for:

BFIT-RX

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 1997-03-05 — Application filed
  • 1997-09-15 — Assigned to examiner
  • 1997-09-16 — Assigned to examiner
  • 1997-09-25 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 1999-04-27 — Use amendment filed
  • 1999-05-25 — Amendment to use processing complete
  • 1999-06-29 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2000-02-28 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2001-03-13 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2001-09-05 — Notice of publication
  • 2001-09-25 — Published for opposition
  • 2001-12-18 — Registered-principal register
  • 2007-01-05 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2007-10-09 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2007-10-09 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
  • 2007-10-27 — Assigned to paralegal
  • 2007-10-31 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2008-02-27 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2008-09-30 — Assigned to paralegal
  • 2008-09-30 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2009-09-09 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2009-09-17 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2010-08-17 — Notice of suit
  • 2011-01-26 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2011-12-07 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2011-12-13 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2011-12-16 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2011-12-16 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2015-10-07 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2015-12-01 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2015-12-01 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2016-03-10 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2016-03-10 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2017-12-27 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2020-12-18 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2021-01-20 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2021-02-05 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2021-02-05 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2021-02-05 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2021-02-05 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
  • 2021-02-05 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2021-02-05 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2021-11-11 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2021-11-11 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2021-11-11 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2021-11-11 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2021-11-11 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2021-11-15 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2021-11-15 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2021-11-15 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2021-11-15 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2021-11-15 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2022-07-01 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2022-07-01 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

RS FIT HOLDINGS LLC
Carlsbad , CA
Bally Total Fitness Holding Corporation
Chicago , IL
Bally Total Fitness Holding Corporation
Chicago , IL
Bally Total Fitness Holding Corporation
Chicago , IL

Correspondent

Marjorie Witter Norman Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP
2029 Century Park East, Suite 3400
Los Angeles, CA 90067
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1997-03-05
Status Date:
2022-07-01
Category:
Pharmaceuticals
Filing Year:
1997

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.