Brandinium

Trademark search for:

COOL SCENTS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2000-09-06 — Application filed
  • 2001-01-23 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2001-02-16 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2001-03-26 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2001-08-13 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2001-10-03 — Notice of publication
  • 2001-10-23 — Published for opposition
  • 2002-01-15 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2002-05-28 — Paper received
  • 2002-07-15 — Paper received
  • 2002-07-15 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2002-08-08 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2003-01-08 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2003-01-08 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2003-01-09 — Paper received
  • 2003-07-09 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2003-07-10 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2003-07-16 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2003-10-02 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2004-01-15 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2004-01-15 — Use amendment filed
  • 2004-02-18 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2004-02-19 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2004-02-24 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2004-04-27 — Registered-principal register
  • 2006-04-04 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2006-04-04 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2006-04-13 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2007-06-07 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2007-07-18 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2007-07-18 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2009-04-27 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2009-04-28 — Assigned to paralegal
  • 2009-05-08 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2013-05-03 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2013-05-31 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2013-06-01 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2013-06-01 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2013-06-01 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 9 - e-mailed
  • 2015-09-23 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2015-09-23 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2016-07-27 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2016-10-12 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2016-10-12 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2017-04-05 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2019-02-27 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2020-07-01 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2020-07-01 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2020-07-01 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2020-07-01 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2020-07-01 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2020-10-14 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2020-10-14 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2020-10-14 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2020-10-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2020-10-14 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2021-01-27 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2023-04-27 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2024-11-08 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2024-11-08 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

ENERGIZER BRANDS II LLC
St. Louis , MO
California Scents
Irvine , CA
California Scents
Irvine , CA
California Scents
Irvine , CA

Correspondent

Andrea J Mealey
533 Maryville University Drive
St. Louis, MO 63141
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2000-09-06
Status Date:
2024-11-08
Category:
Pharmaceuticals
Filing Year:
1997

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.