Brandinium

Trademark search for:

SHEARFORM

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2008-02-06 — Application filed
  • 2008-02-11 — Application filed
  • 2008-02-12 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
  • 2008-05-08 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2008-05-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-05-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-05-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-11-20 — Office action issued
  • 2008-11-20 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-11-20 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2008-12-09 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-12-09 — Suspension letter written
  • 2008-12-09 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-01-22 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2009-01-22 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2009-06-09 — Assigned to lie
  • 2009-06-09 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2009-06-17 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2009-07-01 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2009-07-01 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-07-01 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-12-08 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2009-12-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-12-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-12-16 — Suspension letter written
  • 2009-12-16 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-12-16 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-07-02 — Assigned to lie
  • 2010-07-02 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2010-07-26 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2010-07-26 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-07-26 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-10-13 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2010-12-08 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2010-12-14 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-12-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-12-15 — Suspension letter written
  • 2010-12-15 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-12-15 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-03-23 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2011-04-06 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2011-06-17 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2011-07-10 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2011-07-10 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-07-10 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-01-10 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2012-01-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-01-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-01-19 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2012-01-19 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-01-19 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-06-26 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2012-07-05 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-07-05 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-07-08 — Suspension letter written
  • 2012-07-08 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-07-08 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-08-01 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2013-01-13 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-01-13 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2013-01-13 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-07-10 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2013-07-16 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-07-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-08-06 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2013-08-06 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2013-08-21 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2013-09-10 — Published for opposition
  • 2013-09-10 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2013-11-05 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2014-01-22 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2014-01-22 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2014-05-05 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2014-05-05 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2014-05-28 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2014-05-29 — Office action issued
  • 2014-06-27 — Office action issued
  • 2014-06-27 — Office action issued
  • 2014-07-01 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2014-07-02 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2014-10-27 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2014-10-27 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2014-11-04 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2014-11-05 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2015-01-21 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2015-04-24 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2015-04-24 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2015-04-24 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2015-04-28 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2015-11-05 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2015-11-05 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2015-11-19 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2015-11-19 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2015-11-20 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2016-03-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2016-06-06 — Application abandoned
  • 2016-06-06 — Application abandoned
  • 2016-06-06 — Final status recorded
  • 2025-04-16 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically

Owner Information

VALEANT INTERNATIONAL BERMUDA
HAMILTON BM
VALEANT INTERNATIONAL (BARBADOS) SRL
CHRIST CHURCH BB
Biovail Laboratories International SRL
Christ Church BB
Biovail Laboratories International SRL
Christ Church BB

Correspondent

CHRISTOPHER L. GRAFF Pirkey Barber PLLC
60
600 Congress Avenue, Suite 2120
Austin, TX 78701

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2008-02-06
Status Date:
2016-06-06
Category:
Pharmaceuticals
Filing Year:
1997

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.