Brandinium

Trademark search for:

OLIBRA

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2004-09-29 — Application filed
  • 2004-10-05 — Application filed
  • 2005-04-29 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2005-05-11 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-05-11 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-11-09 — Office action issued
  • 2005-11-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-11-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2005-12-03 — Office action issued
  • 2005-12-03 — Office action issued
  • 2006-06-05 — Office action issued
  • 2006-06-05 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-06-08 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2006-06-08 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2006-06-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2006-06-08 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2006-06-08 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2006-06-09 — Assigned to lie
  • 2006-06-14 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2006-07-12 — Notice of publication
  • 2006-08-01 — Published for opposition
  • 2006-08-30 — Extension of time to oppose received
  • 2006-11-27 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
  • 2007-08-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2008-08-05 — Ttab release case to trademarks
  • 2008-08-05 — Opposition dismissed no. 999999
  • 2008-08-05 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
  • 2008-09-16 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2009-02-05 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2009-02-05 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2009-02-18 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2009-02-18 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2009-03-02 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2009-03-02 — Paper received
  • 2009-03-02 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2009-03-03 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2009-05-06 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2009-05-18 — Paper received
  • 2009-05-27 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2009-08-28 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2009-08-28 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2009-09-03 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2009-09-28 — Notice of allowance cancelled
  • 2009-09-28 — Paper received
  • 2009-09-28 — Petition to director - change basis - received
  • 2009-09-28 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-10-05 — Assigned to petition staff
  • 2009-10-06 — 1(b) basis deleted; new basis requested
  • 2009-10-06 — Petition to director - change basis - granted
  • 2009-11-04 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-11-04 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2009-11-04 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-11-04 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-02-28 — Office action issued
  • 2010-03-01 — Assigned to lie
  • 2010-03-02 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2010-03-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-03-02 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-03-26 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2010-03-30 — Assigned to lie
  • 2010-03-31 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2010-05-04 — Published for opposition
  • 2010-05-04 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2010-07-20 — Registered-principal register
  • 2015-07-20 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2017-02-24 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2017-02-24 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

DSM IP ASSETS B.V.
HEERLEN NL
DSM IP ASSETS B.V.
HEERLEN NL
LTP Lipid Technologies Provider AB
Karlshamn SE

Correspondent

Duane M. Byers Nixon & Vanderhye P.C.
901 North Glebe Road, Suite 1100
Arlington, VA 22203
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2004-09-29
Status Date:
2017-02-24
Category:
Pharmaceuticals
Filing Year:
1998

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.