Trademark search for:

PROQUIN

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2004-01-23 — Application filed
2004-02-03 — Application filed
2004-08-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-08-15 — Assigned to examiner
2004-08-23 — Assigned to lie
2004-08-24 — Law office publication review completed
2004-10-06 — Notice of publication
2004-10-26 — Published for opposition
2005-01-18 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2005-03-15 — Teas statement of use received
2005-03-15 — Use amendment filed
2005-03-15 — Statement of use processing complete
2005-04-13 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2005-04-15 — Assigned to lie
2005-04-22 — Law office registration review completed
2005-04-22 — Assigned to lie
2005-07-12 — Registered-principal register
2008-09-15 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2008-09-15 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2011-04-25 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2011-05-16 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2011-05-19 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2013-02-16 — Teas change of owner address received
2013-02-16 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2016-02-19 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2016-02-19 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Depomed, Inc.
Newark , CA

Depomed, Inc.
Menlo Park , CA

Depomed, Inc.
Menlo Park , CA

Correspondent

Kathleen E. McCarthy KING & SPALDING LLP
1185 AVE. OF THE AMERICAS
NEW YORK, NY 10036
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2004-01-23

Status Date:
2016-02-19

Category:
Pharmaceuticals

Filing Year:
1998

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.