Trademark search for:

NOURELLE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1999-05-25 — Application filed
1999-09-08 — Assigned to examiner
1999-09-13 — Final disposition recorded
2000-01-06 — Examiner's amendment mailed
2000-01-14 — Approved for pub - principal register
2000-04-21 — Notice of publication
2000-05-23 — Published for opposition
2000-08-15 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2001-01-26 — Sou extension 1 filed
2001-03-08 — Sou extension 1 granted
2001-07-27 — Sou extension 2 filed
2001-08-05 — Sou extension 2 granted
2002-01-22 — Sou extension 3 filed
2002-02-20 — Sou extension 3 granted
2002-08-15 — Paper received
2002-08-15 — Sou extension 4 filed
2002-09-12 — Sou extension 4 granted
2003-01-16 — Paper received
2003-01-16 — Sou extension 5 filed
2003-04-10 — Sou extension 5 granted
2003-08-14 — Use amendment filed
2003-08-20 — Paper received
2003-10-04 — Late filed statement of use
2003-10-17 — Application abandoned
2003-11-05 — Fax received
2003-12-02 — Reinstated
2004-01-06 — Statement of use processing complete
2004-01-09 — Case file in ticrs
2004-01-12 — Assigned to examiner
2004-01-12 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2004-03-23 — Registered-principal register
2010-10-29 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2010-10-29 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

MAMBO PTE. LTD.
SG

MAMBO PTE. LTD.
SG

MAMBO PTE. LTD.
SG

Correspondent

DAVID EHRLICH FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC
866 UNITED NATIONS PLZ
NEW YORK, NY 10017
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1999-05-25

Status Date:
2010-10-29

Category:
Pharmaceuticals

Filing Year:
1999

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.