Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
1999 ›
OS ›
OSTEO PADINOL
Trademark search for:
OSTEO PADINOL
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1999-08-10 — Application filed
1999-12-21 — Assigned to examiner
1999-12-29 — Assigned to examiner
2000-01-05 — Final disposition recorded
2000-05-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2000-07-31 — Approved for pub - principal register
2000-12-01 — Notice of publication
2001-01-02 — Published for opposition
2001-01-22 — Extension of time to oppose received
2001-03-15 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
2001-12-04 — Opposition dismissed no. 999999
2001-12-04 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2002-02-05 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2002-07-11 — Paper received
2002-07-11 — Sou extension 1 filed
2002-07-31 — Sou extension 1 granted
2003-01-22 — Paper received
2003-01-22 — Sou extension 2 filed
2003-05-15 — Paper received
2003-05-22 — Sou extension 2 granted
2003-07-29 — Paper received
2003-07-29 — Sou extension 3 filed
2003-08-22 — Sou extension 3 granted
2004-01-30 — Paper received
2004-01-30 — Sou extension 4 filed
2004-02-23 — Sou extension 4 granted
2004-04-26 — Assigned to examiner
2004-07-20 — Case file in ticrs
2004-08-06 — Final status recorded
2004-09-24 — Application abandoned
2004-09-24 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Publimepharm S.A.
MC 98000 MC
Publimepharm S.A.
MC 98000 MC
Correspondent
HOLLY M FORD BANNER & WITCOFF LTD 1001 G ST NW 11TH FL WASHINGTON, DC 20001-4597 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1999-08-10
Status Date:
2004-08-06
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.