Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
2000 ›
FR ›
FRUIT SYMPHONY
Trademark search for:
FRUIT SYMPHONY
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2000-03-23 — Application filed
2000-08-25 — Assigned to examiner
2000-08-31 — Final disposition recorded
2000-12-08 — Examiner's amendment mailed
2000-12-28 — Approved for pub - principal register
2001-03-28 — Notice of publication
2001-04-10 — Published for opposition
2001-04-25 — Extension of time to oppose received
2001-08-07 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2001-09-18 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2003-02-25 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2003-08-25 — Sou extension 1 filed
2003-08-25 — Sou extension 1 granted
2003-08-28 — Paper received
2004-02-25 — Sou extension 2 filed
2004-02-27 — Paper received
2004-03-16 — Sou extension 2 granted
2004-07-21 — Assigned to examiner
2004-08-02 — Paper received
2004-08-05 — Case file in ticrs
2004-08-25 — Use amendment filed
2004-08-25 — Teas change of correspondence received
2004-08-25 — Divisional request received
2004-08-27 — Paper received
2004-09-23 — Divisional processing complete
2004-09-23 — Statement of use processing complete
2004-09-29 — Assigned to examiner
2004-11-14 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2004-11-22 — Assigned to lie
2005-02-07 — Law office registration review completed
2005-04-26 — Registered-principal register
2011-12-02 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2011-12-02 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
NuVim, Inc.
NuVim, Inc.
NuVim, Inc.
Correspondent
MICHAEL MAIZES MAIZES & MAIZES LLP
Filing Details
Filing Date:
Status Date:
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.
