Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
2000 ›
ZE ›
ZELIMAC
Trademark search for:
ZELIMAC
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2000-11-14 — Application filed
2001-04-23 — Assigned to examiner
2001-04-26 — Approved for pub - principal register
2001-08-01 — Notice of publication
2001-08-21 — Published for opposition
2001-11-13 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2002-05-10 — Sou teas extension received
2002-05-10 — Paper received
2002-05-10 — Sou extension 1 filed
2002-05-15 — Sou extension 1 granted
2002-11-08 — Sou teas extension received
2002-11-08 — Sou extension 2 filed
2002-12-19 — Sou extension 2 granted
2003-04-30 — Sou teas extension received
2003-04-30 — Sou extension 3 filed
2003-05-30 — Sou extension 3 granted
2003-07-09 — Teas change of correspondence received
2003-11-11 — Sou teas extension received
2003-11-11 — Sou extension 4 filed
2003-11-19 — Sou extension 4 granted
2004-04-29 — Sou teas extension received
2004-04-29 — Sou extension 5 filed
2004-05-04 — Case file in ticrs
2004-05-06 — Sou extension 5 granted
2004-11-14 — Final status recorded
2004-12-06 — Paper received
2004-12-19 — Teas change of correspondence received
2005-01-19 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2005-03-10 — Application abandoned
2005-03-10 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Novartis AG
Basel CH
Novartis AG
Basel CH
Correspondent
MAURY M TEPPER III WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE PLLC PO BOX 831 RALEIGH, NC 27602 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2000-11-14
Status Date:
2004-11-14
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.