Brandinium

Trademark search for:

CYCLOFEMINA

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2003-05-16 — Application filed
  • 2003-11-20 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2003-11-21 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2003-11-24 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2004-05-20 — Paper received
  • 2004-05-20 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2004-06-03 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2004-12-03 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2005-06-23 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2006-01-13 — Suspension letter written
  • 2006-01-17 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2006-08-03 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2006-08-24 — Suspension letter written
  • 2006-08-25 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2007-03-06 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-03-14 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2007-09-28 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2007-10-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2007-10-31 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2007-11-14 — Notice of publication
  • 2007-12-04 — Published for opposition
  • 2008-02-26 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2008-08-26 — Notice of allowance cancelled
  • 2008-08-28 — Paper received
  • 2008-08-28 — Petition to director - change basis - received
  • 2008-09-04 — Petition to director - change basis - granted
  • 2008-09-04 — Fax received
  • 2008-09-04 — Assigned to petition staff
  • 2008-09-05 — 1(b) basis deleted; new basis requested
  • 2008-10-01 — Notice of publication
  • 2008-10-21 — Published for opposition
  • 2008-11-19 — Extension of time to oppose received
  • 2009-02-11 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2009-02-11 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2009-04-16 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
  • 2012-06-05 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2013-12-11 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
  • 2013-12-11 — Opposition dismissed no. 999999
  • 2013-12-11 — Ttab release case to trademarks
  • 2013-12-13 — On hold - electronic record review required
  • 2014-02-11 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2014-02-11 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-02-11 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-02-11 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-06-17 — Office action issued
  • 2014-06-17 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-06-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2014-07-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2014-07-22 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2014-08-11 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-08-11 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-08-11 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-09-10 — Office action issued
  • 2014-09-17 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-09-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2014-10-07 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2014-10-09 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2014-10-22 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2014-11-11 — Published for opposition
  • 2014-11-11 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2015-01-27 — Registered-principal register
  • 2020-01-27 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2021-09-03 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2021-09-03 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

The Concept Foundation
Pathumthani 12120 TH
The Concept Foundation
Pathumthani 12120 TH
The Concept Foundation
Pathumthani 12120 TH

Correspondent

DAVID J DAVIS BAKER MCKENZIE LLP
300 E RANDOLPH STREET
SUITE 5000
CHICAGO, IL 60601

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2003-05-16
Status Date:
2021-09-03
Category:
Pharmaceuticals
Filing Year:
2003

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.