Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
2003 ›
EN ›
ENLIVEN INTERNATIONAL
Trademark search for:
ENLIVEN INTERNATIONAL
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2003-08-20 — Application filed
2004-02-21 — Assigned to examiner
2004-03-11 — Final disposition recorded
2004-03-29 — Paper received
2004-03-29 — Unresponsive/duplicate paper received
2004-09-13 — Office action issued
2004-09-13 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-09-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2004-09-22 — Assigned to lie
2004-11-10 — Suspension letter written
2004-11-10 — Letter of suspension mailed
2005-05-14 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2005-09-26 — Office action issued
2005-09-26 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-10-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2005-10-07 — Assigned to lie
2005-11-02 — Final disposition recorded
2005-11-02 — Final disposition recorded
2006-05-02 — Office action issued
2006-05-02 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-06-06 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-06-29 — Office action issued
2006-06-30 — Office action issued
2007-01-09 — Teas change of correspondence received
2007-02-09 — Application abandoned
2007-02-09 — Application abandoned
2007-02-09 — Final status recorded
2008-10-22 — Teas change of correspondence received
Owner Information
Enliven International
Washington , UT
Correspondent
A JOHN PATE PATE PIERCE & BAIRD 175 South Main Street, Suite 1250 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2003-08-20
Status Date:
2007-02-09
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.