Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
2004 ›
AC ›
A CLINICAL CONCEPT LED BY SMITH&NEPHEW
Trademark search for:
A CLINICAL CONCEPT LED BY SMITH&NEPHEW
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-05-25 — Application filed
2004-06-08 — Application filed
2004-12-24 — Assigned to examiner
2005-01-22 — Final disposition recorded
2005-01-24 — Final disposition recorded
2005-07-21 — Paper received
2005-07-21 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-08-29 — Amendment from applicant entered
2005-10-01 — Suspension letter written
2005-10-03 — Letter of suspension mailed
2006-02-22 — Paper received
2006-02-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-03-03 — Amendment from applicant entered
2006-04-08 — Final disposition recorded
2006-04-10 — Final disposition recorded
2006-04-18 — Paper received
2006-04-18 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-04-28 — Amendment from applicant entered
2006-05-20 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-05-31 — Assigned to lie
2006-06-06 — Law office publication review completed
2006-07-26 — Notice of publication
2006-08-15 — Published for opposition
2006-10-31 — Registered-principal register
2013-06-07 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2013-06-07 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
SMITH & NEPHEW PLC
LONDON WC2N 6LA GB
SMITH & NEPHEW PLC
LONDON WC2N 6LA GB
SMITH & NEPHEW PLC
LONDON WC2N 6LA GB
Correspondent
BREWSTER TAYLOR STITES & HARBISON PLLC 1199 N FAIRFAX ST STE 900 ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-05-25
Status Date:
2013-06-07
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.