Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
2004 ›
MA ›
MAGNATIL
Trademark search for:
MAGNATIL
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-10-19 — Application filed
2004-10-26 — Application filed
2005-03-22 — Assigned to examiner
2005-03-29 — Final disposition recorded
2005-03-29 — Final disposition recorded
2005-09-28 — Office action issued
2005-09-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-10-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2005-10-21 — Assigned to examiner
2005-10-24 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-10-28 — Assigned to lie
2005-11-02 — Law office publication review completed
2005-11-30 — Paper received
2005-12-07 — Notice of publication
2005-12-27 — Published for opposition
2006-03-21 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2006-09-21 — Sou teas extension received
2006-09-21 — Sou extension 1 filed
2006-11-01 — Sou extension 1 granted
2007-03-21 — Sou extension 2 filed
2007-03-22 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2007-03-22 — Petition to revive-granted
2007-03-22 — Teas petition to revive received
2007-04-18 — Sou extension 2 granted
2007-09-21 — Sou teas extension received
2007-09-21 — Sou extension 3 filed
2007-10-03 — Sou extension 3 granted
2008-03-24 — Final status recorded
2008-05-27 — Application abandoned
2008-05-27 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Zodiac International Corporation
Montevideo UY
Zodiac International Corporation
Montevideo UY
Correspondent
Margaret M. Serrano, Esq. PLANBRAND LLC 2821 E OKLAHOMA AVE MILWAUKEE, WI 53207-3047 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-10-19
Status Date:
2008-03-24
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.