Brandinium

Trademark search for:

RING OF HARMONY

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2004-09-02 — Application filed
  • 2004-09-09 — Application filed
  • 2005-03-31 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-03-31 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-03-31 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2005-04-08 — Paper received
  • 2005-04-08 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-04-21 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2005-05-03 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2005-05-03 — Suspension letter written
  • 2005-05-04 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2006-01-17 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2006-01-18 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2006-04-24 — Paper received
  • 2006-06-02 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2006-08-16 — Suspension letter written
  • 2006-08-17 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2007-02-26 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-02-26 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2007-02-27 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2007-02-28 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2007-06-28 — Paper received
  • 2007-07-03 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2007-07-03 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-07-10 — Suspension letter written
  • 2007-07-11 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2008-01-17 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2008-02-07 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2008-02-11 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2008-02-11 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2008-05-16 — Paper received
  • 2008-05-20 — Suspension letter written
  • 2008-05-20 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2008-05-20 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2008-05-20 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-11-20 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2008-11-20 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2009-03-19 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2009-03-20 — Suspension letter written
  • 2009-03-20 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-03-20 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2009-03-20 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-09-21 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2009-09-24 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2009-09-24 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2010-01-06 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2010-01-06 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2010-01-08 — Paper received
  • 2010-01-14 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2010-01-14 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-01-28 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-01-29 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-02-16 — Paper received
  • 2010-02-25 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2010-02-25 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-03-05 — Office action issued
  • 2010-03-08 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2010-03-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-03-08 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-03-16 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2010-03-31 — Notice of publication
  • 2010-04-20 — Published for opposition
  • 2010-07-06 — Registered-principal register
  • 2017-02-10 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2017-02-10 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

NATURELAND PRODUCTS LTD.
Burnaby, BC CA
NATURELAND PRODUCTS LTD.
Burnaby, BC CA
NATURELAND PRODUCTS LTD.
Burnaby, BC CA
Natureland Bio Products Ltd.
Burnaby CA

Correspondent

DOUGLAS T. JOHNSON MILLER & MARTIN PLLC
832 GEORGIA AVENUE
SUITE 1000 VOLUNTEER BUILDING
CHATTANOOGA, TN 37402-2289

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2004-09-02
Status Date:
2017-02-10
Category:
Pharmaceuticals
Filing Year:
2004

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.