Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
2004 ›
SC ›
SCENTCUBE
Trademark search for:
SCENTCUBE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-12-09 — Application filed
2005-08-11 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2005-08-15 — Application filed
2005-08-15 — Assigned to examiner
2005-08-17 — Final disposition recorded
2005-08-18 — Office action issued
2005-08-23 — Office action issued
2005-09-09 — Office action issued
2006-02-23 — Teas change of correspondence received
2006-02-23 — Office action issued
2006-02-23 — Office action issued
2006-02-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-03-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-03-16 — Final disposition recorded
2006-03-16 — Final disposition recorded
2006-10-12 — Application abandoned
2006-10-12 — Application abandoned
2007-01-11 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2007-01-11 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
2007-01-25 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
2007-10-15 — Final disposition recorded
2007-10-15 — Final disposition recorded
2007-11-02 — Final disposition recorded
2014-11-07 — New representative at ib received
2014-12-10 — Final status recorded
2015-06-26 — Death of international registration
2015-06-27 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg e-mailed
Owner Information
aerome GmbH Scent System Engineering
Dusseldorfe DE
Correspondent
JULIE B SEYLER ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB 666 3RD AVE NEW YORK, NY 10010 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-12-09
Status Date:
2014-12-10
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.