Brandinium

Trademark search for:

TRANSDUR

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2004-11-08 — Application filed
  • 2004-11-15 — Application filed
  • 2005-06-06 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2005-06-12 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-06-12 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-06-12 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2005-12-09 — Office action issued
  • 2005-12-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-12-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2006-01-05 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2006-01-20 — Assigned to lie
  • 2006-01-27 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2006-02-07 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2006-02-21 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
  • 2006-03-03 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2006-03-03 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2006-03-03 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2006-03-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-03-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-08-16 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2006-08-16 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2006-09-12 — Office action issued
  • 2006-09-12 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-09-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2006-10-12 — Office action issued
  • 2006-10-12 — Office action issued
  • 2007-04-06 — Examiners amendment and/or priority action - completed
  • 2007-04-06 — Examiner's amendment/priority action e-mailed
  • 2007-10-05 — Preliminary/voluntary amendment - entered
  • 2007-10-05 — Office action issued
  • 2007-12-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2008-01-29 — Assigned to lie
  • 2008-01-30 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2008-02-13 — Notice of publication
  • 2008-03-04 — Published for opposition
  • 2008-05-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2008-05-27 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2008-11-10 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2008-11-10 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2008-11-10 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2009-05-19 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2009-05-19 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2009-06-05 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2009-06-05 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2009-11-23 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2009-11-23 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2009-11-25 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2010-05-21 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2010-05-21 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2010-05-24 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2010-05-25 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2010-10-27 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2010-10-27 — Use amendment filed
  • 2010-10-29 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2010-11-21 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2010-11-29 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2010-11-30 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2011-01-04 — Registered-principal register
  • 2012-09-07 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2012-09-07 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2013-11-13 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2013-11-13 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2016-01-04 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2017-08-11 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2017-08-11 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Durect Corporation
Cupertino , CA
Durect Corporation
Cupertino , CA
Durect Corporation
Cupertino , CA

Correspondent

MARGARET M. POWERS SHAY GLENN, LLP
2755 CAMPUS DR STE 210
SAN MATEO, CA 94403-2545
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2004-11-08
Status Date:
2017-08-11
Category:
Pharmaceuticals
Filing Year:
2004

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.