Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
2005 ›
CA ›
CARDIAC-PAK
Trademark search for:
CARDIAC-PAK
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-03-17 — Application filed
2005-03-23 — Application filed
2005-10-07 — Final disposition recorded
2005-10-07 — Final disposition recorded
2005-10-07 — Assigned to examiner
2006-04-05 — Office action issued
2006-04-05 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-04-06 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-04-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-04-14 — Assigned to lie
2006-04-18 — Law office publication review completed
2006-05-17 — Notice of publication
2006-06-06 — Published for opposition
2006-08-29 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-01-29 — Sou teas extension received
2007-01-29 — Sou extension 1 filed
2007-04-05 — Sou extension 1 granted
2007-06-01 — Teas change of correspondence received
2007-08-20 — Sou teas extension received
2007-08-20 — Sou extension 2 filed
2007-08-20 — Sou extension 2 granted
2008-02-13 — Sou teas extension received
2008-02-13 — Sou extension 3 filed
2008-02-13 — Sou extension 3 granted
2008-07-25 — Sou teas extension received
2008-07-25 — Sou extension 4 granted
2008-07-25 — Sou extension 4 filed
2009-03-30 — Application abandoned
2009-03-30 — Application abandoned
2009-03-30 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
NeuroSci
Dayton , OH
NeuroSci
Dayton , OH
Correspondent
John C. Serio Seyfarth Shaw LLP Two Seaport Lane Suite 300 Boston, MA 02210-2028
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-03-17
Status Date:
2009-03-30
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.