Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
2006 ›
DI ›
DIOBEX
Trademark search for:
DIOBEX
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-11-08 — Application filed
2006-11-14 — Application filed
2007-03-15 — Assigned to examiner
2007-03-16 — Final disposition recorded
2007-03-16 — Final disposition recorded
2007-05-16 — Office action issued
2007-05-16 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-05-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-05-18 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-06-11 — Assigned to lie
2007-06-11 — Law office publication review completed
2007-06-27 — Notice of publication
2007-07-17 — Published for opposition
2007-08-07 — Extension of time to oppose received
2008-01-14 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
2008-04-16 — Ttab release case to trademarks
2008-04-16 — Opposition dismissed no. 999999
2008-04-16 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2008-05-27 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2008-11-20 — Sou teas extension received
2008-11-20 — Sou extension 1 filed
2008-11-20 — Sou extension 1 granted
2009-05-12 — Sou teas extension received
2009-05-12 — Sou extension 2 filed
2009-05-12 — Sou extension 2 granted
2009-12-28 — Application abandoned
2009-12-28 — Application abandoned
2009-12-28 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
DiObex, Inc.
San Francisco , CA
DiObex, Inc.
San Francisco , CA
Correspondent
JOHN C. BAUM, ESQ. TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP TWO EMBARCADERO CENTER 8TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-11-08
Status Date:
2009-12-28
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.