Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
2006 ›
OM ›
OMAZENT
Trademark search for:
OMAZENT
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-05-05 — Application filed
2006-05-10 — Application filed
2006-10-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-10-10 — Assigned to examiner
2006-10-17 — Assigned to lie
2006-10-17 — Law office publication review completed
2006-11-15 — Notice of publication
2006-12-05 — Published for opposition
2007-02-27 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-06-28 — Sou teas extension received
2007-06-28 — Sou extension 1 filed
2007-06-28 — Sou extension 1 granted
2008-01-30 — Sou teas extension received
2008-01-30 — Sou extension 2 filed
2008-02-21 — Sou extension 2 granted
2008-07-18 — Sou teas extension received
2008-07-18 — Sou extension 3 filed
2008-07-30 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2008-07-30 — Sou extension 3 granted
2009-01-26 — Sou teas extension received
2009-01-26 — Sou extension 4 filed
2009-01-29 — Sou extension 4 granted
2009-08-06 — Sou teas extension received
2009-08-06 — Sou extension 5 filed
2009-08-10 — Sou extension 5 granted
2009-11-18 — Teas change of correspondence received
2010-03-29 — Application abandoned
2010-03-29 — Application abandoned
2010-03-29 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Glaxo Group Limited
Greenford, Middlesex GB
Glaxo Group Limited
Greenford, Middlesex GB
Correspondent
Diane K. Fry GlaxoSmithKline LGTM, MAI.B475-D Five Moore Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-05-05
Status Date:
2010-03-29
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.