Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
2007 ›
DH ›
DHACTIVE
Trademark search for:
DHACTIVE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-04-24 — Application filed
2007-07-19 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2007-07-20 — Application filed
2007-08-08 — Assigned to examiner
2007-08-09 — Final disposition recorded
2007-08-10 — Office action issued
2007-08-10 — Office action issued
2007-08-10 — Office action issued
2007-09-01 — Office action issued
2008-02-13 — Teas change of correspondence received
2008-02-13 — Office action issued
2008-02-13 — Petition to revive-granted
2008-02-13 — Teas petition to revive received
2008-02-14 — Assigned to lie
2008-02-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-02-15 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-03-07 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-03-07 — Law office publication review completed
2008-03-26 — Notice of publication
2008-04-15 — Published for opposition
2008-05-15 — Extension of time to oppose received
2008-05-28 — Application abandoned
2008-06-10 — Application abandoned
2008-06-10 — Application abandoned
2008-07-24 — Death of international registration
2008-07-24 — Final status recorded
2008-12-25 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2008-12-25 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
Owner Information
Lonza AG (Lonza Ltd.)
CH
Lonza AG (Lonza Ltd.)
CH
Correspondent
A. W. METZ & CO. AG ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB 666 THIRD AVENUE 10TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10017
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-04-24
Status Date:
2008-07-24
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.