Trademark search for:

EXFORGE HCTZ

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2007-06-11 — Application filed
2007-06-14 — Application filed
2007-08-13 — Assigned to examiner
2007-08-20 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-09-24 — Assigned to lie
2007-09-24 — Law office publication review completed
2007-10-10 — Notice of publication
2007-10-30 — Published for opposition
2008-01-22 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2008-07-15 — Sou teas extension received
2008-07-15 — Sou extension 1 filed
2008-07-25 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2008-07-25 — Sou extension 1 granted
2009-01-21 — Sou teas extension received
2009-01-21 — Sou extension 2 filed
2009-02-05 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2009-02-05 — Sou extension 2 granted
2009-06-25 — Teas change of correspondence received
2009-07-16 — Sou teas extension received
2009-07-16 — Sou extension 3 filed
2009-07-20 — Sou extension 3 granted
2010-01-12 — Sou teas extension received
2010-01-12 — Sou extension 4 filed
2010-01-15 — Sou extension 4 granted
2010-07-20 — Sou teas extension received
2010-07-20 — Sou extension 5 filed
2010-07-29 — Sou extension 5 granted
2010-07-30 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2011-02-21 — Application abandoned
2011-02-21 — Final status recorded
2011-02-22 — Application abandoned

Owner Information

Novartis AG
Basel CH

Novartis AG
Basel CH

Correspondent

MAURY M TEPPER III Tepper & Eyster, PLLC
3724 Benson Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2007-06-11

Status Date:
2011-02-21

Category:
Pharmaceuticals

Filing Year:
2007

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.