Brandinium

Trademark search for:

EXPECT MORE FROM US

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2007-07-17 — Application filed
  • 2007-07-20 — Application filed
  • 2007-10-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-10-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-10-22 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2007-10-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-04-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2008-04-22 — Office action issued
  • 2008-04-22 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-05-15 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2008-05-15 — Suspension letter written
  • 2008-05-15 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-05-15 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-05-15 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2008-05-15 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2008-05-15 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2008-11-15 — Assigned to lie
  • 2008-11-15 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2008-11-25 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2008-11-25 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-11-25 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-05-26 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2009-05-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-05-27 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2009-05-27 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-11-30 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2009-12-29 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2009-12-29 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-12-29 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-06-14 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2010-06-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-06-16 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-06-19 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2011-01-10 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2011-02-01 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2011-02-01 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-02-01 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-07-26 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2011-08-02 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2011-08-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-08-02 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-08-05 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2011-09-13 — Published for opposition
  • 2011-09-13 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2011-11-29 — Registered-principal register
  • 2012-08-28 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2012-08-28 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2016-11-29 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2018-05-24 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2018-06-06 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2018-06-07 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2018-06-09 — Registered - partial sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2018-06-09 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
  • 2019-05-24 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2020-11-29 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2022-06-10 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2022-06-10 — Final status recorded
  • 2023-01-18 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership

Owner Information

APOLLO HEALTHCARE CORP.
TORONTO, ONTARIO CA
Rwachsberg Holdings Inc.
Toronto, Ontario CA
Rwachsberg Holdings Inc.
Concord, ONTARIO CA
Rwachsberg Holdings Inc.
Concord, ONTARIO CA

Correspondent

STEPHEN R. BAIRD Greenberg Traurig LLP
90 South 7th Street
Suite 3500
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2007-07-17
Status Date:
2022-06-10
Category:
Pharmaceuticals
Filing Year:
2007

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.