Trademark search for:

LIVAFLUSH

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2007-05-11 — Application filed
2007-05-17 — Application filed
2007-05-24 — Application abandoned
2007-05-24 — Application abandoned
2007-05-24 — Application abandoned
2007-05-24 — Final status recorded
2013-06-25 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2013-06-25 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2013-08-08 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2013-08-08 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2014-03-27 — Teas change of correspondence received
2015-09-18 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-04-07 — Teas change of correspondence received
2017-12-11 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2017-12-11 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2018-02-14 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2018-02-14 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2023-03-03 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2023-03-03 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
2023-03-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
2023-03-03 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2024-05-14 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2024-05-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
2024-05-14 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received

Owner Information

GHC ND Licensing, Ltd.
Castries LC

Correspondent

John Davis Kearney, McWilliams & Davis, PLLC
55 Waugh #150
Houston, TX 77007
United States

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2007-05-11

Status Date:
2007-05-24

Category:
Pharmaceuticals

Filing Year:
2007

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.