Trademark search for:

BURP-A-COLIC

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2008-01-24 — Application filed
2008-01-29 — Application filed
2008-01-30 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2008-05-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-05-01 — Assigned to examiner
2008-05-02 — Assigned to lie
2008-05-02 — Law office publication review completed
2008-05-21 — Notice of publication
2008-06-10 — Published for opposition
2008-09-02 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2009-03-02 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2009-04-06 — Application abandoned
2009-04-06 — Application abandoned
2009-04-22 — Paper received
2009-04-22 — Petition to revive-received
2009-04-27 — Assigned to petition staff
2009-05-14 — Petition granted - issue new noa
2009-06-10 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2009-06-10 — New noa to issue
2009-07-21 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-02-22 — Application abandoned
2010-02-22 — Application abandoned
2010-02-22 — Final status recorded
2020-03-23 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2020-03-23 — Teas change of owner address received
2020-03-23 — Teas change of correspondence received
2020-03-23 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2020-03-23 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received

Owner Information

REMICO ENTERPRISE, INC.
MIAMI , FL

REMICO ENTERPRISE, INC.
MIAMI , FL

Correspondent

RUBEN ALCOBA, ESQ. ALCOBA LAW GROUP, P.A
6355 NW 36th Street Suite 201
MIAMI, FL 33166
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2008-01-24

Status Date:
2010-02-22

Category:
Pharmaceuticals

Filing Year:
2008

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.