Brandinium

Trademark search for:

INTENDIS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2004-09-08 — Application filed
  • 2004-09-15 — Application filed
  • 2004-10-21 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2004-10-21 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2004-10-21 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2005-04-26 — Paper received
  • 2005-04-26 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-05-05 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2005-05-18 — Office action issued
  • 2005-05-18 — Office action issued
  • 2005-08-04 — Paper received
  • 2005-08-04 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-08-09 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2005-08-11 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2005-08-12 — Assigned to lie
  • 2005-08-17 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2005-09-07 — Notice of publication
  • 2005-09-27 — Published for opposition
  • 2005-12-20 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2006-06-13 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2006-06-13 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2006-06-30 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2006-12-13 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2006-12-13 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2007-02-16 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2007-04-19 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2007-04-19 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2007-07-18 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2007-07-30 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2007-09-24 — Use amendment filed
  • 2007-09-24 — Paper received
  • 2007-09-24 — Divisional request received
  • 2007-10-17 — Divisional processing complete
  • 2007-10-17 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2007-11-15 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-11-19 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2007-11-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-11-28 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-11-28 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-11-28 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-11-30 — Data modification completed
  • 2008-05-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2008-05-23 — Office action issued
  • 2008-05-23 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-06-12 — Office action issued
  • 2008-06-12 — Office action issued
  • 2008-06-12 — Office action issued
  • 2008-12-12 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2008-12-12 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
  • 2008-12-12 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2008-12-12 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
  • 2008-12-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2008-12-15 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-01-18 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-01-18 — Notification of action denying req for recon e-mailed
  • 2009-01-18 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
  • 2009-07-27 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2009-07-27 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-07-27 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-07-27 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2009-07-27 — Su-examiner's amendment written
  • 2009-08-03 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2009-09-08 — Exparte appeal terminated
  • 2009-09-08 — Registered-principal register
  • 2013-12-25 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2016-04-15 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2016-04-15 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

BAYER PHARMA AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
BERLIN DE
BAYER SCHERING PHARMA AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
BERLIN DE
BAYER SCHERING PHARMA AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
BERLIN DE
Schering Aktiengesellschaft
Berlin DE
Schering Aktiengesellschaft
Berlin DE

Correspondent

WILLIAM F. LAWRENCE FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP
745 5TH AVENUE
NEW YORK, NY 10151-0099
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2004-09-08
Status Date:
2016-04-15
Category:
Pharmaceuticals
Filing Year:
2008

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.