Brandinium

Trademark search for:

MANA SWEEP

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2008-08-07 — Application filed
  • 2008-08-11 — Application filed
  • 2008-08-12 — Notice of design search code mailed
  • 2008-10-21 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2008-10-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-10-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-10-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-04-10 — Office action issued
  • 2009-04-10 — Assigned to lie
  • 2009-04-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-04-15 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-05-06 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-05-08 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2009-05-27 — Notice of publication
  • 2009-06-16 — Published for opposition
  • 2009-09-08 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2010-03-05 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2010-03-05 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2010-03-05 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2010-08-19 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2010-08-19 — Use amendment filed
  • 2010-09-08 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2010-09-08 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2010-10-01 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2010-10-01 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2010-10-01 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2010-10-02 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2010-10-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-10-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-10-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-03-08 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2011-03-08 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2011-04-19 — Office action issued
  • 2011-04-22 — Assigned to lie
  • 2011-04-25 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-04-25 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-06-08 — Office action issued
  • 2011-06-08 — Office action issued
  • 2011-06-08 — Office action issued
  • 2011-06-09 — Sou extension 3 denial letter prepared
  • 2011-06-09 — Sou extension 3 denial letter prepared
  • 2011-07-18 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2011-07-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-07-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-08-18 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-08-18 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-08-18 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-09-08 — Office action issued
  • 2011-09-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-09-14 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-09-30 — Data modification completed
  • 2011-09-30 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2011-10-08 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2011-10-11 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2011-10-12 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
  • 2011-11-15 — Registered-principal register
  • 2011-12-27 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2011-12-27 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
  • 2012-01-06 — Review of correspondence complete - power of attorney entered
  • 2013-12-03 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2013-12-03 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2016-11-15 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2018-06-22 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2018-06-22 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Makhteshim Agan of North America Inc.
Raleigh , NC
Makhteshim Agan of North America Inc.
Raleigh , NC
Makhteshim Agan of North America Inc.
Raleigh , NC

Correspondent

MICHELLE P. CIOTOLA CANTOR COLBURN LLP
20 CHURCH STREET
22ND FLOOR
HARTFORD, CT 06103

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2008-08-07
Status Date:
2018-06-22
Category:
Pharmaceuticals
Filing Year:
2008

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.