Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
2008 ›
TE ›
TEZALVO
Trademark search for:
TEZALVO
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2008-05-28 — Application filed
2008-06-02 — Application filed
2008-09-09 — Assigned to examiner
2008-09-11 — Final disposition recorded
2008-09-11 — Final disposition recorded
2008-09-11 — Final disposition recorded
2009-03-10 — Office action issued
2009-03-10 — Office action issued
2009-03-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-03-11 — Assigned to lie
2009-03-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-04-01 — Final disposition recorded
2009-04-01 — Final disposition recorded
2009-04-01 — Final disposition recorded
2009-04-25 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-04-25 — Office action issued
2009-04-25 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-04-26 — Suspension letter written
2009-04-26 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2009-04-26 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2009-10-26 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2009-11-05 — Suspension inquiry written
2009-11-05 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2009-11-05 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2010-05-05 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2010-05-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-05-14 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2010-05-14 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-11-18 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2010-12-09 — Suspension inquiry written
2010-12-09 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2010-12-09 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2011-02-24 — Teas change of correspondence received
2011-05-24 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2011-05-24 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-05-25 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-05-31 — Data modification completed
2011-05-31 — Approved for pub - principal register
2011-05-31 — Law office publication review completed
2011-07-05 — Published for opposition
2011-07-05 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2011-08-30 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2012-02-10 — Sou teas extension received
2012-02-10 — Sou extension 1 filed
2012-02-10 — Sou extension 1 granted
2012-02-14 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2012-08-02 — Sou teas extension received
2012-08-02 — Sou extension 2 filed
2012-08-16 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2012-08-20 — Sou extension 2 granted
2012-08-21 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2013-01-31 — Sou teas extension received
2013-01-31 — Sou extension 3 filed
2013-02-04 — Sou extension 3 granted
2013-02-05 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2013-07-23 — Sou teas extension received
2013-07-23 — Sou extension 4 filed
2013-08-22 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2013-08-22 — Sou extension 4 granted
2013-08-23 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2014-01-13 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2014-01-13 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2014-01-15 — Sou teas extension received
2014-01-15 — Sou extension 5 filed
2014-01-21 — Sou extension 5 granted
2014-01-22 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2014-03-19 — Teas change of correspondence received
2014-10-06 — Application abandoned
2014-10-06 — Application abandoned
2014-10-06 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Gaithersburg , MD
Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Gaithersburg , MD
Correspondent
Paolo A. Strino LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP 30 BROAD STREET, 21st FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10004 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2008-05-28
Status Date:
2014-10-06
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.