Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
2009 ›
AR ›
ARROSOF
Trademark search for:
ARROSOF
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-02-09 — Application filed
2006-02-15 — Application filed
2006-07-26 — Assigned to examiner
2006-07-28 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-08-04 — Assigned to lie
2006-08-10 — Law office publication review completed
2006-08-30 — Notice of publication
2006-09-19 — Published for opposition
2006-12-12 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-02-09 — Teas change of correspondence received
2007-05-23 — Assigned to examiner
2007-06-11 — Sou teas extension received
2007-06-11 — Sou extension 1 filed
2007-08-29 — Sou extension 1 granted
2007-11-20 — Sou teas extension received
2007-11-20 — Sou extension 2 filed
2007-11-20 — Sou extension 2 granted
2008-06-02 — Sou teas extension received
2008-06-02 — Sou extension 3 filed
2008-06-02 — Sou extension 3 granted
2008-12-03 — Sou teas extension received
2008-12-03 — Sou extension 4 filed
2008-12-16 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2008-12-16 — Sou extension 4 granted
2009-06-09 — Sou teas extension received
2009-06-09 — Sou extension 5 filed
2009-06-15 — Sou extension 5 granted
2010-01-11 — Application abandoned
2010-01-11 — Application abandoned
2010-01-11 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Pfizer Inc.
New York , NY
Pfizer Inc.
New York , NY
Correspondent
Katrina Edge PFIZER INC. 150 EAST 42ND STREET Legal Division - Trademark Department NEW YORK, NY 10017
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-02-09
Status Date:
2010-01-11
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.