Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
2009 ›
CH ›
CHASTITY CHEWING GUM
Trademark search for:
CHASTITY CHEWING GUM
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-09-21 — Application filed
2009-09-24 — Application filed
2009-09-24 — Application filed
2009-12-17 — Examiners amendment -written
2009-12-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-12-17 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2009-12-17 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2009-12-17 — Examiner's amendment entered
2009-12-17 — Assigned to examiner
2010-01-08 — Assigned to lie
2010-01-08 — Law office publication review completed
2010-02-16 — Published for opposition
2010-02-16 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-05-11 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-11-11 — Sou extension 1 filed
2010-12-13 — Application abandoned
2010-12-13 — Application abandoned
2011-01-17 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2011-01-17 — Petition to revive-granted
2011-01-17 — Teas petition to revive received
2011-02-14 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2011-02-14 — Sou extension 1 granted
2011-02-15 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2011-04-11 — Use amendment filed
2011-04-11 — Paper received
2011-04-14 — Use affidavit failed formalities
2011-05-12 — Final status recorded
2011-07-12 — Application abandoned
2011-07-12 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Dash, Lawrence A.
Zion Grove , PA
Dash, Lawrence A.
Zion Grove , PA
Correspondent
DASH, LAWRENCE A. PO BOX 25 ZION GROVE, PA 17985-0025 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-09-21
Status Date:
2011-05-12
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.