Trademark search for:

GLUCO INTERCEPT

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2009-04-30 — Application filed
2009-05-04 — Application filed
2009-05-05 — Application filed
2009-07-24 — Final disposition recorded
2009-07-24 — Assigned to examiner
2009-07-27 — Final disposition recorded
2009-08-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-08-21 — Office action issued
2009-08-21 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-09-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-09-05 — Assigned to lie
2009-09-05 — Law office publication review completed
2009-09-23 — Notice of publication
2009-10-13 — Published for opposition
2010-01-05 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-03-08 — Sou teas extension received
2010-03-08 — Sou extension 1 filed
2010-03-08 — Sou extension 1 granted
2010-11-16 — Sou teas extension received
2010-11-16 — Sou extension 2 filed
2010-11-29 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2010-11-29 — Sou extension 2 granted
2010-11-30 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2011-07-01 — Sou teas extension received
2011-07-01 — Sou extension 3 filed
2011-07-05 — Sou extension 3 granted
2011-07-06 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2012-02-06 — Application abandoned
2012-02-06 — Application abandoned
2012-02-06 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Natrol, Inc.
Chatsworth , CA

Natrol, Inc.
Chatsworth , CA

Correspondent

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB
666 3RD AVE
NEW YORK, NY 10017-4011
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2009-04-30

Status Date:
2012-02-06

Category:
Pharmaceuticals

Filing Year:
2009

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.