Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
2009 ›
MI ›
MIN-LYTE
Trademark search for:
MIN-LYTE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-03-31 — Application filed
2006-04-06 — Application filed
2006-07-24 — Teas change of correspondence received
2006-09-13 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-09-13 — Assigned to examiner
2006-09-22 — Assigned to lie
2006-09-26 — Law office publication review completed
2006-10-25 — Notice of publication
2006-11-14 — Published for opposition
2007-02-06 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-07-31 — Sou teas extension received
2007-07-31 — Sou extension 1 filed
2007-09-19 — Sou extension 1 granted
2007-12-17 — Sou teas extension received
2007-12-17 — Sou extension 2 filed
2007-12-17 — Sou extension 2 granted
2008-07-30 — Sou teas extension received
2008-07-30 — Sou extension 3 filed
2008-07-30 — Sou extension 3 granted
2009-01-28 — Sou teas extension received
2009-01-28 — Sou extension 4 granted
2009-01-28 — Sou extension 4 filed
2009-07-17 — Sou teas extension received
2009-07-17 — Sou extension 5 filed
2009-08-17 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2009-08-17 — Sou extension 5 granted
2010-03-08 — Application abandoned
2010-03-08 — Application abandoned
2010-03-08 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Paddock Laboratories, Inc.
Minneapolis , MN
Paddock Laboratories, Inc.
Minneapolis , MN
Correspondent
Z. Peter Sawicki WESTMAN, CHAMPLIN & KELLY, P.A. Suite 1400 900 Second Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55402
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-03-31
Status Date:
2010-03-08
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.