Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
2009 ›
MU ›
MUST BE THE OS-CAL
Trademark search for:
MUST BE THE OS-CAL
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-07-05 — Application filed
2005-07-11 — Application filed
2005-07-29 — Paper received
2005-07-29 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-08-06 — Amendment from applicant entered
2005-09-09 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-09-09 — Assigned to examiner
2005-09-16 — Assigned to lie
2005-09-19 — Law office publication review completed
2005-10-26 — Notice of publication
2005-11-15 — Published for opposition
2006-02-07 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2006-07-12 — Sou teas extension received
2006-07-12 — Sou extension 1 filed
2006-07-12 — Sou extension 1 granted
2007-01-16 — Sou teas extension received
2007-01-16 — Sou extension 2 filed
2007-01-16 — Sou extension 2 granted
2007-08-06 — Sou teas extension received
2007-08-06 — Sou extension 3 filed
2007-08-06 — Sou extension 3 granted
2008-01-23 — Sou teas extension received
2008-01-23 — Sou extension 4 granted
2008-01-23 — Sou extension 4 filed
2008-06-25 — Sou teas extension received
2008-06-25 — Sou extension 5 filed
2008-06-25 — Sou extension 5 granted
2009-03-09 — Application abandoned
2009-03-09 — Application abandoned
2009-03-09 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Aventis Holdings, Inc.
Greenville , DE
Aventis Holdings, Inc.
Greenville , DE
Correspondent
Susan Upton Douglass FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C. 866 UNITED NATIONS PLZ NEW YORK, NY 10017-1822 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-07-05
Status Date:
2009-03-09
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.