Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
2009 ›
VI ›
VIVANOSORB
Trademark search for:
VIVANOSORB
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-07-20 — Application filed
2009-07-23 — Application filed
2009-07-23 — Application filed
2009-07-24 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2009-09-10 — Assigned to examiner
2009-09-12 — Final disposition recorded
2009-09-12 — Final disposition recorded
2009-09-12 — Final disposition recorded
2009-11-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-11-09 — Office action issued
2009-11-09 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-11-23 — Suspension letter written
2009-11-23 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2009-11-23 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2010-03-11 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2010-03-11 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-03-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-03-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-03-27 — Assigned to lie
2010-03-27 — Law office publication review completed
2010-05-04 — Published for opposition
2010-05-04 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-07-20 — Registered-principal register
2017-02-24 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2017-02-24 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Paul Hartmann Aktiengesellschaft
Heidenheim DE
Paul Hartmann Aktiengesellschaft
Heidenheim DE
Paul Hartmann Aktiengesellschaft
Heidenheim DE
Correspondent
LAUREL V. DINEFF DINEFF TRADEMARK LAW LIMITED 160 N WACKER DR CHICAGO, IL 60606-1633 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-07-20
Status Date:
2017-02-24
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.