Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
2010 ›
DI ›
DIABETIC POLYHERB
Trademark search for:
DIABETIC POLYHERB
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2016-10-14 — Application filed
2016-10-18 — Application filed
2016-10-19 — Application filed
2017-01-25 — Assigned to examiner
2017-01-31 — Final disposition recorded
2017-01-31 — Final disposition recorded
2017-01-31 — Final disposition recorded
2017-07-11 — Assigned to examiner
2017-07-31 — Office action issued
2017-08-22 — Assigned to lie
2017-08-24 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-08-24 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-08-30 — Office action issued
2017-08-30 — Office action issued
2017-08-30 — Office action issued
2018-02-28 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2018-03-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-03-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-03-14 — Final disposition recorded
2018-03-14 — Final disposition recorded
2018-03-14 — Final disposition recorded
2018-09-14 — Office action issued
2018-09-17 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-09-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-09-17 — Office action issued
2018-09-17 — Final disposition recorded
2018-09-17 — Final disposition recorded
2019-04-15 — Application abandoned
2019-04-15 — Application abandoned
2019-04-15 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
DAS, PREMA
STATEN ISLAND , NY
Correspondent
XAVIER MORALES LAW OFFICE OF XAVIER MORALES PO BOX 6510 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78209 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2016-10-14
Status Date:
2019-04-15
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.