Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
2010 ›
MU ›
MULTI-HEALTH FIBER
Trademark search for:
MULTI-HEALTH FIBER
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2010-08-11 — Application filed
2010-08-14 — Application filed
2010-08-16 — Application filed
2010-11-24 — Assigned to examiner
2010-11-29 — Final disposition recorded
2010-11-29 — Final disposition recorded
2010-11-29 — Final disposition recorded
2010-11-30 — Teas amendment of use received
2010-12-01 — Use amendment filed
2010-12-01 — Amendment to use processing complete
2010-12-03 — Use amendment accepted
2010-12-04 — Notice of acceptance of amendment to allege use e-mailed
2011-01-20 — Office action issued
2011-01-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-01-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-02-16 — Office action issued
2011-02-16 — Office action issued
2011-02-16 — Office action issued
2011-08-16 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-08-16 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2011-08-16 — Assigned to lie
2011-08-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-09-09 — Final disposition recorded
2011-09-09 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
2011-09-09 — Notification of action denying req for recon e-mailed
2012-05-15 — Application abandoned
2012-05-15 — Final status recorded
2012-05-16 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cincinnati , OH
Correspondent
Rene L. Guess THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY 299 E. Sixth Street S7-226 CINCINNATI, OH 45202
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2010-08-11
Status Date:
2012-05-15
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.