Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
2012 ›
AP ›
APICLEAR
Trademark search for:
APICLEAR
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2012-01-20 — Application filed
2012-01-24 — Application filed
2012-01-25 — Application filed
2012-01-26 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2012-04-30 — Assigned to examiner
2012-05-02 — Final disposition recorded
2012-05-02 — Final disposition recorded
2012-05-02 — Final disposition recorded
2012-11-02 — Office action issued
2012-11-09 — Assigned to lie
2012-11-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-11-15 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-12-06 — Examiners amendment -written
2012-12-06 — Suspension letter written
2012-12-06 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2012-12-06 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2012-12-06 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2012-12-06 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2012-12-06 — Examiner's amendment entered
2013-06-07 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2013-06-20 — Suspension inquiry written
2013-06-20 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2013-06-20 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2013-08-02 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2013-08-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-08-02 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-08-06 — Approved for pub - principal register
2013-08-07 — Law office publication review completed
2013-08-21 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2013-09-10 — Published for opposition
2013-09-10 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2013-11-05 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2014-05-05 — Sou teas extension received
2014-05-05 — Sou extension 1 filed
2014-05-28 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2014-05-29 — Sou extension 1 granted
2014-05-30 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2014-11-05 — Sou teas extension received
2014-11-05 — Sou extension 2 filed
2014-11-13 — Sou extension 2 granted
2014-11-14 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2015-05-05 — Sou teas extension received
2015-05-05 — Sou extension 3 filed
2015-05-12 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2015-05-22 — Sou extension 3 granted
2015-05-23 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2015-10-14 — Divisional request received
2015-11-05 — Teas statement of use received
2015-11-05 — Teas request to divide received
2015-11-05 — Use amendment filed
2015-11-24 — Office action issued
2015-11-25 — Teas post publication amendment received
2015-11-25 — Office action issued
2015-11-25 — Office action issued
2015-12-08 — Divisional processing complete
2015-12-08 — Statement of use processing complete
2015-12-09 — Notice of pseudo mark e-mailed
2015-12-15 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2015-12-16 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2016-01-19 — Registered-principal register
2021-01-19 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2021-06-09 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2021-06-09 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
2021-06-09 — Teas change of owner address received
2021-06-09 — Teas change of correspondence received
2021-06-09 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2021-06-09 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2022-07-29 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2022-07-29 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Emdoc Limited
Auckland NZ
Emdoc Limited
Auckland NZ
Emdoc Limited
Auckland NZ
Correspondent
Glenn A. Gundersen DECHERT LLP 2929 Arch Street, Cira Centre Philadelphia, PA 19104-2808 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2012-01-20
Status Date:
2022-07-29
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.