Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
2012 ›
DA ›
DAEOHM
Trademark search for:
DAEOHM
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2012-11-01 — Application filed
2012-11-05 — Application filed
2012-11-07 — Application filed
2013-02-13 — Assigned to examiner
2013-02-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
2013-02-22 — On hold - electronic record review required
2013-02-25 — Electronic record review complete
2013-03-13 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2013-03-20 — Teas change of owner address received
2013-03-20 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2013-04-02 — Published for opposition
2013-04-02 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2013-05-28 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2013-11-08 — Sou teas extension received
2013-11-08 — Sou extension 1 filed
2013-11-08 — Sou extension 1 granted
2013-11-12 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2014-05-02 — Sou teas extension received
2014-05-02 — Sou extension 2 filed
2014-05-27 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2014-05-27 — Sou extension 2 granted
2014-05-28 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2014-12-29 — Application abandoned
2014-12-29 — Application abandoned
2014-12-29 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Glaxo Group Limited
Brentford, Middlesex GB
Glaxo Group Limited
Brentford, Middlesex GB
Correspondent
CHRISTOPHER M. HANES GLAXOSMITHKLINE 5 MOORE DR RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27709-0183 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2012-11-01
Status Date:
2014-12-29
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.