Brandinium

Trademark search for:

MONDELEZ

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2012-03-23 — Application filed
  • 2012-03-27 — Application filed
  • 2012-03-30 — Application filed
  • 2012-04-24 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2012-05-18 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-05-18 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-05-18 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-08-20 — Office action issued
  • 2012-08-23 — Assigned to lie
  • 2012-08-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-08-27 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-09-06 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2012-09-06 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2012-09-06 — Suspension letter written
  • 2012-09-06 — Suspension letter written
  • 2012-09-06 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-09-06 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-09-06 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-09-06 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-09-06 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2012-09-06 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2012-09-06 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2012-09-06 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2012-09-06 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2012-09-06 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2012-10-12 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2012-10-12 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2012-10-12 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2012-10-12 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2012-10-15 — Suspension letter written
  • 2012-10-15 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-10-15 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-04-19 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2013-04-19 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-04-19 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-04-19 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2013-04-19 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2013-06-19 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2013-09-18 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2013-09-20 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2013-09-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-09-27 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-09-27 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2013-09-29 — Suspension letter written
  • 2013-09-29 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-09-29 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-04-15 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2014-04-16 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2014-04-16 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-04-16 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-10-15 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2014-10-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2014-10-21 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-10-22 — Suspension letter written
  • 2014-10-22 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-10-22 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-05-19 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2015-05-20 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2015-05-20 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-05-20 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-07-22 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2015-07-29 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2015-07-29 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2015-08-18 — Priority action written
  • 2015-08-18 — Priority action e-mailed
  • 2015-08-18 — Notification of priority action e-mailed
  • 2016-02-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2016-02-10 — Office action issued
  • 2016-02-10 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2016-02-11 — Suspension letter written
  • 2016-02-11 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-02-11 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-03-21 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2016-03-31 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2016-03-31 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2016-04-04 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2016-04-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2016-04-04 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2016-04-04 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2016-04-04 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2016-04-12 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2016-04-26 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
  • 2016-05-18 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2016-06-07 — Published for opposition
  • 2016-06-07 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2016-08-02 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2016-08-03 — Teas delete 1(b) basis received
  • 2016-08-03 — Notice of allowance cancelled
  • 2016-08-27 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2016-09-01 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
  • 2016-09-06 — Teas post publication amendment received
  • 2016-09-07 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2016-09-27 — Review of correspondence complete
  • 2016-09-27 — Assigned to petition staff
  • 2016-10-04 — Registered-principal register
  • 2017-11-03 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2017-11-03 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2021-10-04 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2023-04-14 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2023-04-14 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

INTERCONTINENTAL GREAT BRANDS LLC
EAST HANOVER , NJ
INTERCONTINENTAL GREAT BRANDS LLC
EAST HANOVER , NJ
INTERCONTINENTAL GREAT BRANDS LLC
EAST HANOVER , NJ
Kraft Foods Global Brands LLC
Northfield , IL

Correspondent

Melissa V. Harrup Intercontinental Great Brands LLC
100 Deforest Avenue
East Hanover, NJ 07936
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2012-03-23
Status Date:
2023-04-14
Category:
Pharmaceuticals
Filing Year:
2012

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.