Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
2015 ›
RY ›
RYZIMMU
Trademark search for:
RYZIMMU
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2015-08-03 — Application filed
2015-08-06 — Application filed
2015-08-07 — Application filed
2015-11-13 — Assigned to examiner
2015-11-14 — Approved for pub - principal register
2015-12-02 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2015-12-22 — Published for opposition
2015-12-22 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2016-02-16 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2016-08-11 — Sou teas extension received
2016-08-11 — Sou extension 1 filed
2016-08-11 — Sou extension 1 granted
2016-08-13 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2017-02-14 — Sou teas extension received
2017-02-14 — Sou extension 2 filed
2017-02-14 — Sou extension 2 granted
2017-02-16 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2017-08-08 — Sou teas extension received
2017-08-08 — Sou extension 3 filed
2017-08-08 — Sou extension 3 granted
2017-08-10 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2018-01-24 — Sou teas extension received
2018-01-24 — Sou extension 4 filed
2018-01-24 — Sou extension 4 granted
2018-01-26 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2018-09-17 — Application abandoned
2018-09-17 — Application abandoned
2018-09-17 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Argos Therapeutics, Inc.
Durham , NC
Argos Therapeutics, Inc.
Durham , NC
Correspondent
MAURY M. TEPPER, III Tepper & Eyster Pllc 3724 Benson Dr Raleigh, NC 27609-7321 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2015-08-03
Status Date:
2018-09-17
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.