Trademark search for:

ENERGIZE AF

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2017-08-12 — Application filed
2017-08-16 — Application filed
2017-08-18 — Application filed
2017-08-18 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2017-08-18 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2017-08-19 — Notice of design search code e-mailed
2017-11-15 — Assigned to examiner
2017-11-21 — Final disposition recorded
2017-11-21 — Final disposition recorded
2017-11-21 — Final disposition recorded
2018-05-16 — Office action issued
2018-05-22 — Assigned to lie
2018-05-24 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-05-24 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-05-30 — Office action issued
2018-05-30 — Office action issued
2018-05-30 — Office action issued
2018-11-27 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2018-11-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-11-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-11-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
2018-12-19 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2019-01-08 — Published for opposition
2019-01-08 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2019-03-05 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2019-10-07 — Application abandoned
2019-10-07 — Application abandoned
2019-10-07 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Seay, Duncan A.
Tiburon , CA

Seay, Duncan A.
Tiburon , CA

Correspondent

Jay Begler Niesar & Vestal LLP
90 New Montgomery Street, Ninth Floor
Ninth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2017-08-12

Status Date:
2019-10-07

Category:
Pharmaceuticals

Filing Year:
2017

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.