Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Pharmaceuticals ›
2021 ›
DR ›
DROPZ
Trademark search for:
DROPZ
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2013-11-04 — Application filed
2013-11-07 — Application filed
2013-11-14 — Application filed
2013-11-15 — Notice of pseudo mark e-mailed
2013-11-19 — Assigned to examiner
2013-11-20 — Approved for pub - principal register
2013-11-25 — Assigned to lie
2013-11-26 — Law office publication review completed
2013-12-08 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
2013-12-17 — Examiners amendment -written
2013-12-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
2013-12-17 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2013-12-17 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2013-12-17 — Examiner's amendment entered
2013-12-17 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2013-12-30 — Law office publication review completed
2014-01-15 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2014-02-04 — Extension of time to oppose received
2014-02-04 — Published for opposition
2014-02-04 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2014-03-14 — Teas amendment of use received
2014-03-14 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2014-03-14 — Letter of protest evidence forwarded
2014-03-17 — Suspension letter written
2014-03-17 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2014-03-17 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2014-03-17 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2014-03-19 — Teas amendment of use received
2014-03-31 — Use amendment filed
2014-03-31 — Use affidavit failed formalities
2014-04-03 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2014-04-17 — Suspension letter written
2014-04-17 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2014-04-17 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2014-04-17 — Use amendment accepted
2014-04-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-04-17 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-04-18 — Notice of acceptance of amendment to allege use e-mailed
2014-10-17 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2015-04-20 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2015-09-24 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2015-09-24 — Teas change of correspondence received
2015-09-24 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2015-09-24 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
2015-09-28 — Amendment from applicant entered
2015-09-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-09-29 — Suspension letter written
2015-09-29 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2015-09-29 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2016-03-29 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2016-09-29 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2017-04-03 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2017-04-03 — Assigned to lie
2017-10-03 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2018-04-03 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2018-10-03 — Assigned to lie
2018-10-04 — Data modification completed
2018-10-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
2018-10-04 — Law office publication review completed
2018-10-17 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2018-11-06 — Published for opposition
2018-11-06 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2019-01-01 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2019-08-05 — Application abandoned
2019-08-05 — Application abandoned
2019-08-05 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
MUSCLEPHARM CORPORATION
Denver , CO
MUSCLEPHARM CORPORATION
Denver , CO
Correspondent
Gaston Kroub Kroub, Silbersher & Kolmykov PLLC 305 Broadway, 7th Floor New York, NY 10007 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2013-11-04
Status Date:
2019-08-05
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.