Trademark search for:

SUGAR FIBER

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2003-12-23 — Application filed
2004-01-07 — Application filed
2004-07-09 — Assigned to examiner
2004-07-12 — Final disposition recorded
2005-01-11 — Examiners amendment -written
2005-01-11 — Examiners amendment -written
2005-01-12 — Examiners amendment mailed
2005-01-12 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-01-24 — Assigned to lie
2005-01-25 — Teas change of correspondence received
2005-01-26 — Law office publication review completed
2005-04-27 — Notice of publication
2005-05-17 — Published for opposition
2005-08-09 — Registered-principal register
2009-12-31 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2011-08-04 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2011-09-12 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2011-09-12 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2011-09-12 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
2012-08-29 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2014-10-23 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2015-10-07 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2016-03-11 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2016-03-11 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Panolam Industries International, Inc.
Shelton , CT

Panolam Industries International, Inc.
Shelton , CT

Panolam Industries International, Inc.
Shelton , CT

Correspondent

Richard D. Getz O'SHEA GETZ P.C.
SUITE 912
1500 MAIN STREET
SPRINGFIELD, MA 01115

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2003-12-23

Status Date:
2016-03-11

Category:
Rubber & Plastics

Filing Year:
2003

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.