Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Rubber & Plastics ›
2005 ›
FI ›
FINEOHM
Trademark search for:
FINEOHM
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-09-26 — Application filed
2005-09-30 — Application filed
2006-03-30 — Priority action written
2006-03-30 — Priority action e-mailed
2006-03-30 — Assigned to examiner
2006-06-29 — Office action issued
2006-06-29 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-07-05 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-07-27 — Examiners amendment -written
2006-07-27 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2006-07-27 — Examiner's amendment entered
2006-08-18 — Priority action written
2006-08-18 — Priority action e-mailed
2006-10-18 — Office action issued
2006-10-18 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-10-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-11-02 — Examiners amendment -written
2006-11-02 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2006-11-02 — Examiner's amendment entered
2006-11-08 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-11-09 — Assigned to lie
2006-11-15 — Law office publication review completed
2006-12-06 — Notice of publication
2006-12-26 — Published for opposition
2007-03-20 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-09-21 — Final status recorded
2007-12-07 — Application abandoned
2008-01-02 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Teijin Dupont Films Japan Limited
Tokyo JP
Teijin Dupont Films Japan Limited
Tokyo JP
Correspondent
CYNTHIA C WEBER SUGHRUE MION PLLC 2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 800 WASHINGTON, DC 20037-3200 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-09-26
Status Date:
2007-09-21
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.